(toplevel) Fix dramatic breakage for ordinary crosses (related to program_transform_name)

[Alexandre Oliva]

On Dec 29, 2002, Michael Elizabeth Chastain <mec@shout.net> wrote:

> Perhaps you think of "make -j" as an inherently unsafe option.

Nope.  It's just not the default.  If you're using a non-default
option, why can't we ask you to also use another non-default option to
make it absolutely safe?

> I build gcc about 50 times per week with automated scripts.

Then you could tweak your automated scripts to enable the
safest-possible set up, in case you actually find it to be a problem.
I'm yet to hear of any actual occurrences of a problem.  I very much
doubt we're ever going to, even if we disable serialized dependencies.

-- 
Alexandre Oliva   Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer                 aoliva@{redhat.com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp        oliva@{lsd.ic.unicamp.br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist                Professional serial bug killer