gas warning fixes 8

[Stan Shebs]

Zack Weinberg wrote:

>Alexandre Oliva <aoliva@redhat.com> writes:
>
>
>>That said, perhaps we should have a variant of the unused attribute
>>that asks gcc to warn if it turns out to be used.  There are times
>>when this is actually what one would want from it.
>>
>
>I think a sane way to do that would be to add the C++
>unnamed-parameter notation to C as an extension:
>
>void foo (char *, char *)
>{
>}
>
>is valid and defines foo with the signature void (char *, char *), but
>the parameters are inaccessible within the function.
>
CodeWarrior allows this BTW, and its lack recently came up as a barrier
for CW users migrating their code to GCC.  It would also be a handy
way to make static inlines in a header equally palatable to C and C++
source files.

Stan