GOT refcounting broke non-refcount targets

[Alan Modra]

On Wed, Aug 21, 2002 at 06:11:08PM -0400, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
> But if got.offset is being used instead of got.refcount, then 0 is a valid
> offset.

Oops.  My fault.

> Sparc has the same problem and even worse: the only use of got.refcount in
> elf32-sparc.c is:
>             if (h->got.refcount > 0)
>               h->got.refcount--;

Rip the code out.  elf32_sparc_gc_sweep_hook is bogus.  It should
just return true.

> Any comments?

Hmm, perhaps pass "struct elf_backend_data *" to copy_indirect_symbol
(it's always called as bed->elf_backend_copy_indirect_symbol, so
that is no bother), then do

void
_bfd_elf_link_hash_copy_indirect (dir, ind, bed)
     struct elf_link_hash_entry *dir, *ind;
     struct elf_backend_data *bed;
{
  bfd_signed_vma tmp;
  bfd_signed_vma lowest_valid = bed->can_refcount;
.
.
  tmp = dir->got.refcount;
  if (tmp < lowest_valid)
    {
      dir->got.refcount = ind->got.refcount;
      ind->got.refcount = tmp;
    }
  else
    BFD_ASSERT (ind->got.refcount < lowest_valid);
.
.
}

Of course, that means editing more files.  I'll do the grunt work if
you a) think it's better, and b) don't want to edit files yourself.  :)


> +  else
> +    BFD_ASSERT (ind->got.refcount <= 0);

I think this test should be < 0

-- 
Alan Modra
IBM OzLabs - Linux Technology Centre