[RFA:] test-case for relocs for linkonce-excluded sections don't become zero, causing g++ EH failure

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

> Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2001 16:04:56 -0700
> From: Geoff Keating <geoffk@geoffk.org>

> the conclusion that was generally
> agreed was that ld's behaviour is correct, and that GCC should instead,
> for functions in linkonce sections, also put their EH data in linkonce
> sections.
> 
> See < http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-06/msg00413.html >
> and the following thread.

Thanks.  A nice little patch there for the "bug", which I'll use
locally until Someone does TRT.  Speaking of DTRT, I see
<URL: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2001-06/msg00559.html >.
Any news about that?  Did something come out of it?  What can I
(or Someone) do to help?

In the meantime, there's a serious misunderstanding of linkonce
functionality between gcc and binutils in CVS.

brgds, H-P