gas bug report

[Ben Elliston]

Error reporting for local labels is a little bit sketchy.  Here is a
test case that demonstrates one problem:

foo:
	# should produce an error
	call 0f

	# should produce an error (and does)
	# if you uncomment the insn below, the first error disappears.
	# call 1b

The first "call" instruction (in isolation) produces the correct error
message, but in the presence of the second "call" instruction, the
first error message is lost and replaced with the second.  Shouldn't
both be reported?

Ben