libbfd documentation date is too old

[David O'Brien]

On Fri, Oct 26, 2001 at 01:13:25PM +0100, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > The libbfd docs still say "First Edition--BFD version < 3.0" "April
> > 1991".  There have been updates to the BFD docs since 1991, so this
> > is misleading to a reader.  Should this date be bumped up, or the
> > text entirely removed?
> 
> Well maybe the text should be expanded a little bit.  What do you
> think of this ?

Look better. :-)
However, I've never really understood what "BFD version < 3.0" meant.
Was there a planed rewrite that would have been dubbed "3.0" or
something?