GAS patch for sh*-unknown-linux-gnu
Ralf Corsepius
corsepiu@faw.uni-ulm.de
Wed Oct 3 06:16:00 GMT 2001
Am Mit, 2001-10-03 um 14:06 Uhr schrieb NIIBE Yutaka:
> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > Well, I am not sure if this patch is a good idea.
> > IMHO, it introduces compatibility problems and complications at doubtful
> > benefits:
>
> Could you please read the patch, and possibly test it?
> It doesn't change any sh target except sh*-unknown-linux-gnu
This is exactly what I am referring to:
It changes the behavior of "sh-*-as" from always using bigendian (except
wince) by default into something indeterministically, requiring
different flags for different "sh-*-as" variants, introducing additional
complication to configurations (configure-scripts), Makefiles etc.
I would prefer all sh-*-as variants to exhibit the same behavior on all
targets. WinCE not doing so already is bad enough, IMO.
> > * -big would be redundant to -little and actually is of little use for
> > all sh users but linux-gnu users.
>
> When little endian is default, we need -big.
Well, IMHO the word "need" is false, here.
You could easily provide -little from inside gcc if you want to make
_gcc_ to default to little endianness and let a -big option be handled
there.
Similar procedures are applied to many other architectures as well.
I am even inclined to say having an "as" which does not need any other
option can rarely be met anywhere.
> > Additionally, I also do not understand why a new variable
> > "target_big_endian" shall be used instead of "shl". AFAIU, it breaks
> > sourcecode backward compatibility at no real functional benefits.
>
> It is not new variable. The variable "target_big_endian" is used
> every other targets. SH target uses "shl" in some not clear reason.
OK, I haven't known about this. I only noticed that your patch would
break my experimental patches for reasons being not obvious to me.
Ralf
More information about the Binutils
mailing list