vtable pseudo ops
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Mon Mar 12 17:17:00 GMT 2001
On Mon, Mar 12, 2001 at 01:56:55PM +0100, Bo Thorsen wrote:
> And a small thing: What should the name of the sections be? I'm currently
> using .vte and .vti but this does not say as much of the contents as
> .vtable.entry and .vtable.inherit or .vtable_e and .vtable_i.
Probably .gnu.vtable_[ei].
> + /* Special sections to handle c++ vtable special relocations. */
> + { ".vti", SHT_PROGBITS, 0 },
> + { ".vte", SHT_PROGBITS, 0 },
You should invent new section types for these, so that one day we
can have a linker that doesn't depend on magic section names.
I suggest putting them near the existing SHT_GNU_verdef types in
include/elf/common.h.
r~
More information about the Binutils
mailing list