Partial symbol export vs --export-dynamic

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

> From: Ben Elliston <bje@redhat.com>
> Date: Mon, 18 Jun 2001 12:38:00 +1000 (EST)

> I see no reason why it shouldn't be possible for you to list C++
> symbols in an unmangled form and let the linker mangle them as the
> export file is processed.  Am I missing something, anyone?

Perhaps something like that there's only a *de*mangler built-in
through libiberty?  A mangler generally requires a C++-parser,
IIUC.  Or some other trick currently not implemented.

brgds, H-P