What changed in ld?
Philip Blundell
philb@gnu.org
Fri Jun 1 11:25:00 GMT 2001
>>That tells me something has changed in the way ld handles the .bss
>>section between 3.1 and 4.3 - either on purpose or as a bug.
>>This completely invalidates my assembly language tutorial. If the
>>change was on purpose, can someone please tell me what new switch
>>I need to use with ld to recognize the .bss section as being bss?
This question is rather broad. I think you will need to provide a testcase
and explain what you think is wrong about the new behaviour.
p.
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)
iD8DBQE7F936VTLPJe9CT30RAnl0AKDLoe01xAbmAXDLfp/bBr8c4/XYXACbB1yk
OQKO2/+vvOLIsezOJKYtjKs=
=lwBG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Binutils
mailing list