[PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
Philip Blundell
philb@gnu.org
Tue Jul 10 10:43:00 GMT 2001
>I didn't realize syncing libiberty from top of tree would be considered
>risky.
It's not, particularly. But it's bound to introduce changes that haven't been
thoroughly tested, so it does carry some risk. I'd rather not do that unless
it brings a clear and compelling benefit.
>Would you be open to me adding lbasename.c to the 2.11 branch + adding
>the prototype to libiberty.h and libiberty/Makefile* ?
Yes.
p.
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)
iD8DBQE7Sz7DVTLPJe9CT30RAkwEAJwIRApAnddM4WmESDbaV5fiHHJQ1ACguSBa
WafmJ05Mz/3E65av9HMdrA4=
=3One
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Binutils
mailing list