[PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'

Philip Blundell philb@gnu.org
Tue Jul 10 00:34:00 GMT 2001


>I'd like to update libiberty in the 2.11 branch based on top of tree (to
>bring in lbasename).  Is that something you could do?  (IIRC you usually
>handle the updates of libiberty w/in Binutils)

That would make me a bit nervous.  Is there any particular issue you want to 
address?  If it's just adding lbasename, I'd have thought there would be a 
less intrusive way to achieve that without updating the whole of libiberty.

p.


-- 
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)

iD8DBQE7Sq/hVTLPJe9CT30RAtM4AJ4hdW0fKJUN8Enf/m5g2+0DIBCTFQCfZSY7
2DvEqDQOuu8K7XFRKwOI/CM=
=TYV0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


More information about the Binutils mailing list