[PATCH] basename buffer gets spammed in `ld'
Philip Blundell
philb@gnu.org
Tue Jul 10 00:34:00 GMT 2001
>I'd like to update libiberty in the 2.11 branch based on top of tree (to
>bring in lbasename). Is that something you could do? (IIRC you usually
>handle the updates of libiberty w/in Binutils)
That would make me a bit nervous. Is there any particular issue you want to
address? If it's just adding lbasename, I'd have thought there would be a
less intrusive way to achieve that without updating the whole of libiberty.
p.
--
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Exmh version 2.1.1 10/15/1999 (debian)
iD8DBQE7Sq/hVTLPJe9CT30RAtM4AJ4hdW0fKJUN8Enf/m5g2+0DIBCTFQCfZSY7
2DvEqDQOuu8K7XFRKwOI/CM=
=TYV0
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
More information about the Binutils
mailing list