next release

[Alan Modra]

On Sat, 20 Jan 2001, Jakub Jelinek wrote:

> Can anyone approve
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-12/msg00328.html
> or tell me what's wrong with it? Basically, readelf either does not work at
> all with symbol versioning (if first vma is large) or shows wrong
> information from time to time (even with first vma 0).

I noticed an inconsistency in the code printing verdefs.  The code you
trimmed out used

			  GET_DATA (offset + ivd.vd_aux, evda,
				    "version definition aux");

while the code left in uses

		      GET_DATA (offset - ivd.vd_next + ivd.vd_aux,
				evda, "version def aux");

It looks to me you chose the correct one, but please double check this,
then check it in.

Alan Modra
-- 
Linuxcare.  Support for the Revolution.