SPARC64 & SPARC binutils
Richard Henderson
rth@redhat.com
Sun Jan 7 00:11:00 GMT 2001
On Sun, Jan 07, 2001 at 05:03:05PM +1100, matthew green wrote:
> i don't understand this. gcc 2.95.2 produces vaguely useful sparc64 code,
> but there are many, many *serious* bugs in it. gcc-current last i tried
> wouldn't even build for "sparc64-elf", either as a native target or cross
> compiled (from x86). see the two PR's i logged against gcc.
There is major infrastrucural work that has to be merged
back from subreg-byte-branch in order to get a reliable
sparc64 compiler.
So either check out the branch from cvs, or look at the
patches contained in the rh7 gcc 2.96 rpms.
r~
More information about the Binutils
mailing list