A patch to only warn undefined symbol in DSO to be built
H . J . Lu
hjl@valinux.com
Wed Feb 7 00:15:00 GMT 2001
On Wed, Feb 07, 2001 at 07:03:58PM +1100, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Feb 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:
>
> > Here is a patch.
>
> I have a competing one that I was busy checking when your email arrived.
> :-)
>
> Index: elflink.h
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/src/src/bfd/elflink.h,v
> retrieving revision 1.78
> diff -u -p -r1.78 elflink.h
> --- elflink.h 2001/01/23 11:45:53 1.78
> +++ elflink.h 2001/02/07 07:58:30
> @@ -5092,9 +5092,10 @@ elf_link_output_extsym (h, data)
> warnings for them. */
> if (! finfo->info->relocateable
> && ! finfo->info->allow_shlib_undefined
> - && ! (finfo->info->shared
> - && !finfo->info->no_undefined)
> && h->root.type == bfd_link_hash_undefined
> + && (! finfo->info->shared
> + || ! finfo->info->no_undefined
> + || (h->root.u.undef.abfd->flags & DYNAMIC) == 0)
> && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_DYNAMIC) != 0
> && (h->elf_link_hash_flags & ELF_LINK_HASH_REF_REGULAR) == 0)
> {
>
> It does the same thing in a slightly different way, but also checks for
Are you sure it works? I added
finfo->output_bfd == h->root.u.undef.abfd
to check if the undefined symbol is in the DSO to be built.
> bfd_link_hash_undefined before accessing h_.root.u.undef
>
That is not bad.
--
H.J. Lu (hjl@valinux.com)
More information about the Binutils
mailing list