traditional mips vs. little endian?
Eric Christopher
echristo@redhat.com
Wed Aug 1 02:52:00 GMT 2001
> Err, agree with which? 8-)
>
I was thinking changing the default abi, but your arguments are
compelling...
>
> * making the test-case consistent w/ the configury as it is now, or
>
> * Making only IRIX use the SGI ABI ('non-traditional'), and move all
> existing non-os-specific 'embedded' targets (incl. mips-elf and
> mipsel-elf) over to 'traditional mips' (or worse, even the non-IRIX
> OS-specific ones)?
>
>
> I don't really like latter choice, but don't _deeply_ care either.
> Certainly it would make things more consistent, but is it really
> desirable to change the ABI and configuration in use for ... who knows
> how long, for those targets?
Good point. I'd like to use a different ABI by default, but I'm not
sure what the deal would be with breaking all of the previous. Does
anyone have any advice here?
-eric
--
Look out behind you!
More information about the Binutils
mailing list