elflink.h -Bsymbolic change

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

> Date: Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:12:39 +1000 (EST)
> From: Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au>

> On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:

> > As I said, protected symbols
> > should be no different from default, global symbols to the static
> > linker since protected symbols are the same as default, global symbols
> > if there are second definitions.
> 
> OK, I'll defer to your judgement.  If the dynamic linker does the right
> thing then there should be no problem in keeping a .plt entry.  Please
> check in your patch, hp.

Done.  Though I don't really understand why we're not allowed to
get rid of the local PLT entry for the DSO in this case.

brgds, H-P