elflink.h -Bsymbolic change

Alan Modra alan@linuxcare.com.au
Sun Apr 8 19:39:00 GMT 2001


On Sun, 8 Apr 2001, H . J . Lu wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 09, 2001 at 11:31:35AM +1000, Alan Modra wrote:
> > 
> > Actually, I don't think it is correct.  Certainly, I shouldn't have forced
> > the protected symbols local, but on the other hand they do need to lose
> > their .plt entry, don't they?  Otherwise they won't be "protected" from
> > the dynamic linker binding against some other symbol.  See attached patch
> 
> No, it is the job for the dynamic linker. I don't think you should
> change PLT for protected.

H.J.,  before my 2001-04-04 change went in, protected symbols would have
lost their .plt entry.  Are you saying this is wrong?

-- 
Alan Modra



More information about the Binutils mailing list