[Proposed binutils PATCH] Re: Diagnosing an intricate C++ problem
David O'Brien
obrien@NUXI.com
Tue Sep 5 02:31:00 GMT 2000
On Sat, Sep 02, 2000 at 11:35:13AM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> FWIW, as far as I know, binutils 2.10 is too old and so many bugs
> have been fixed since then.
(*sigh*)
I really wonder how to get the FSF/GNU toolchain software development
efforts to follow the FreeBSD and OpenBSD development method of actually
merging fixes in the HEAD development branch back to the release branch
-- GASP! rather than letting the release branch stagnate to the point of
totally uselessness. [the GCC 2.95 branch is a fine example of this, and
the binutils_2.10_release branch only has 40KB of diff from release to
this moment (and this *includes* the diff header CVS puts for each diff].
--
-- David (obrien@NUXI.com)
More information about the Binutils
mailing list