A very "strange" bug in gcc 2.96

[Richard Henderson]

On Mon, May 22, 2000 at 10:42:46AM -0700, Mike Stump wrote:
> Given this description, I think the default
> should be off for targets that can only have fewer reloc bits than the
> instruction it is replacing (if the number is sufficiently small).

Um, the *default* is off.  Period.  One has to add stuff to the
machine description before tail calls happen *at all*.  That stuff
includes the answer to the question "can I tail call to this function".


r~