textdomain warning removal

Michael Meissner meissner@cygnus.com
Fri May 12 10:54:00 GMT 2000


On Fri, May 12, 2000 at 05:35:16PM +1000, Ben Elliston wrote:
> > Has anyone any objection to changing the definition of textdomain and
> > bindtextdomain as follows?  This silences gcc as regards
> > "warning: statement with no effect"
> 
> These changes are a bit unfortunate in light of the need to retain
> compatibility with ancient compilers.  GDB now requires an ISO C compiler
> to build it (e.g. GCC).  Can't the binutils follow suit?

No.  With the debugger, you don't have to build it with the native compiler,
since you could always build GCC first.  But the C only portion of GCC and
binutils must still be compilable by compilers with unfortunate limitations.

-- 
Michael Meissner, Cygnus Solutions, a Red Hat company.
PMB 198, 174 Littleton Road #3, Westford, Massachusetts 01886, USA
Work:	  meissner@redhat.com		phone: +1 978-486-9304
Non-work: meissner@spectacle-pond.org	fax:   +1 978-692-4482


More information about the Binutils mailing list