[PATCH]: ld/Makefile.am

[H . J . Lu]

On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 02:37:36PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Mar 10, 2000, "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Fri, Mar 10, 2000 at 02:11:03PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> 
> >> Then please explain how come pexecute prints that message.
> 
> You didn't.
> 
> >> How did you make sure that collect2 was properly exec()ed?
> 
> > I even ran ld-new by hand.
> 
> This doesn't answer my question.  I still don't have any reason to
> believe it's a bug in libtool that causes this problem, and that it's
> your patch that magically solves it, so I'd recommend against its
> installation unless you show why it solves the problem, and it's not
> just a coincidence.
> 

# /work/ia64/bin/cygnus/20000303/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/ia64-cygnus-linux/ia64-cygnus-linux/bin/ -B/usr/ia64-cygnus-linux/ia64-cygnus-linux/lib/ -B/work/ia64/bin/cygnus/20000303/gcc/ -g -O2 -pipe -Dno_inhibit_libc -fvtable-thunks -D_GNU_SOURCE -fno-implicit-templates -Wl,-soname,libstdc++-libc6.1-2.so.3 -shared -o libstdc++-3-libc6.1-2-2.10-ia64-000216.so `cat piclist` -lm 
gcc: installation problem, cannot exec `/work/ia64/bin/cygnus/20000303/gcc/collect2': Argument list too long
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status

Does this answer your question? 

Any other objections to the latest patch to the top level Makefile.in?


H.J.