Another patch for visibility.
H . J . Lu
Thu Jun 1 11:23:00 GMT 2000
On Thu, Jun 01, 2000 at 11:20:13AM -0700, David O'Brien wrote:
> On Tue, May 30, 2000 at 12:31:11PM -0700, H . J . Lu wrote:
> > I'd like to check in this patch if it is ok with everyone. There is
> > no need to check if the visibility is changed. We can have
> > 1. "xxxx" is weak undefined with the hidden visibility in foo.o.
> > 2. "xxxx" is defined with the normal visibility in bar.o.
> This almost seems like something that would be good to have in 2.10 (or
> 2.10.1). Do you plan to merge it into that branch when possible?
It is not my call.
H.J. Lu (email@example.com)
More information about the Binutils