glibc 2.1 and gabi

[Andrew Cagney]

"H . J . Lu" wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2000 at 12:26:57PM -0700, Nick Clifton wrote:
> > : Well, it is kind of misleading since glibc 2.1 does support dynamic
> > : tags. It just doesn't support the unknown tags in certain range.
> > :
> > : --enable-new-dynamic-tags
> > : --no-enable-new-dynamic-tags
> > :
> > : is better.
> >
> > That is OK with me.
> 
> How about just
> 
> --disable-new-dynamic-tags
> --enable-new-dynamic-tags

Um, do you really want to call something ``new''.  Similar to the
comment I just posted to GCC-patches, it will be old soon enough.

	Andrew