[EFifer@sanwaint.com: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)]

[DJ Delorie]

Can I revert this patch and put it back on the discussion block?

------- Start of forwarded message -------
Mailing-List: contact cygwin-help@sourceware.cygnus.com; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Subscribe: < mailto:cygwin-subscribe@sources.redhat.com >
List-Archive: < http://sources.redhat.com/ml/cygwin/ >
List-Post: < mailto:cygwin@sources.redhat.com >
List-Help: < mailto:cygwin-help@sources.redhat.com >, < http://sources.redhat.com/ml/#faqs >
Sender: cygwin-owner@sources.redhat.com
From: "Fifer, Eric" <EFifer@sanwaint.com>
To: cygwin@sources.redhat.com
Subject: RE: binutils prerelease available for testing (feedback needed)
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 18:46:40 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset="iso-8859-1"


Danny Smith wrote:
>But, rebuilding binutils-000718 after reverting the changes made to
>gas/config/obj_coff.c
>( http://sources.redhat.com/ml/binutils/2000-07/msg00226.html )  back to
>binutils-000717 version, I can successfully build and link against dlls,
>using either dllwrap or gcc -shared.

Yes, rebuilding binutils-20000718-1 with the patch you mention
reversed out, clears up the problems I'm seeing.

Thanks,

Eric Fifer

- --
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Send a message to cygwin-unsubscribe@sourceware.cygnus.com
------- End of forwarded message -------