binutils development (was Re: Problems building binutils-000220 snapshot)
Mon Feb 21 20:36:00 GMT 2000
H . J . Lu writes:
> On Mon, Feb 21, 2000 at 10:40:38PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> > The split is not that large, as far as I know. I only have a couple
> > of patches from H.J. in my mail file. In the message you quote,
> I have lost track of what I have submitted. I don't feel like sending
> in new ones while the old ones are still on the backlog. It is very
> likely that the old patches may not apply cleanly now.
Except that the binutils list is now archived.
I looked for redefine-sym in the archives (using the web search
interface) and couldn't find it. If submitted again, it _would_
be archived this time.
Besides, everyone at Cygnus that I know kept track of patches
that have been submitted. You're far from the only one who's
had to deal with long patch approval/check-in times.
You don't have a directory somewhere where you keep submissions
so that you can refer back to them and monitor they're progress?
More information about the Binutils