Patch to allow targets to prevent inlining
Mon Feb 14 16:36:00 GMT 2000
Geoff Keating writes:
> > : > Besides, just because it wouldn't be needed for naked
> > : > functions any more, there is no reason to suppose that individual
> > : > targets might not have other reasons for suppressing inlining.
> glibc needs this feature. There are one or two places where some
> functions must be inlined, and other functions must not, and they
> all have to be in one C file (some of the ones that `must not' are the
> ones that call the `must's :-( ).
You realize Nick's patch won't help with this, right?
More information about the Binutils