PA64 configure issues
Jeffrey A Law
law@cygnus.com
Thu Apr 27 13:26:00 GMT 2000
In message < orpurb8k6p.fsf@zecarneiro.lsd.ic.unicamp.br >you write:
> On Apr 27, 2000, Jeffrey A Law <law@cygnus.com> wrote:
>
> > I'm not worried about the ones with hppa* -- I've already identified thos
> e;
> > it's those which do stuff like hppa?.? that I worry about.
>
> Well, those are already broken, since this doesn't match hppa-*-hpux*.
> And they don't match the trailing `w' either, so it's ok if they don't
> match an additional trailing `64'. I wouldn't worry about them.
hppa without a version number is not valid in a configuration string. The
fact that gcc and maybe other accept it is lame and broken.
jeff
More information about the Binutils
mailing list