Demangler update?

[H . J . Lu]

On Fri, Apr 14, 2000 at 10:31:18AM -0700, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>    Date: Fri, 14 Apr 2000 10:20:46 -0700
>    From: "H . J . Lu" <hjl@lucon.org>
> 
>    > In any case, we only need to fully solve the 90% case, in which there
>    > is only one compiler around, while retaining enough flexibility to
>    > handle unusual cases such as the one you describe.
> 
>    I don't think my case is that unusual. As of today, on my Linux
>    box, there are C++ binaries linked with 4 different versions
>    of libstdc++, compiled with 4 different versions of g++.
> 
> I hope you aren't trying to argue that you are a typical user.  I
> believe that most developers use one compiler which they rarely
> change.
> 

3 out of 4 different versions of shared libstdc++ are provided
by Red Hat 6.2. They are parts of the libstdc++ 2.9.0-30 rpm. You
can say most if not all Red Hat users have similar installations
like me.


H.J.