Patch for opcodes portability botch

[Michael Sokolov]

Alan Modra <alan@linuxcare.com.au> wrote:

> But it's not necessary for const.  That's done in ansidecl.h [...]

Oops, you're right, my bad. So my patch could be made humbler in this respect
if necessary.

> which you've
> removed and replaced with sysdep.h in some of these files.

As sysdep.h directly includes ansidecl.h, I thought there was no point in
keeping #include "ansidecl.h" when adding #include "sysdep.h", and so I removed
it.

> Including
> sysdep.h is not that bad a thing, but if you do then it would be cleaner
> to remove <stdio.h> and others like it from the top level file as they are
> in sysdep.h

Yeah, right now it's pretty chaotic, no consistency in what to include. So you
think that simply including sysdep.h everywhere and no other redundant headers
is the right way to go? If so, I'll make a patch for that tomorrow.

--
Michael Sokolov		Harhan Engineering Laboratory
Public Service Agent	International Free Computing Task Force
			International Engineering and Science Task Force
			615 N GOOD LATIMER EXPY STE #4
			DALLAS TX 75204-5852 USA

Phone: +1-214-824-7693 (Harhan Eng Lab office)
E-mail: msokolov@ivan.Harhan.ORG (ARPA TCP/SMTP) (UUCP coming soon)