ld test failure on ARM GNU/Linux

[Alan Modra]

On 11 Apr 2000, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:

>    Until this is done, or some other fix is found, may I apply my fix to the
>    main branch?
> 
> I would prefer not, unless gcc has garbage collection tests in its own
> testsuite.  If gcc has garbage collection tests, then the binutils
> tests are less interesting.  If gcc does not, then I think we should
> keep the binutils tests.

I've committed a patch (main branch only) to selective.exp that checks
for the presence of foo__1B, and for good measure, that _start and foo__1A
are there too.  There's also a fudge in 3.cc for gcc-2.95.2, so we
shouldn't see any FAILs from the test.

-- 
Linuxcare.  Support for the Revolution.