[binutils-gdb] ARM print_insn_mve assertion
Alan Modra
amodra@sourceware.org
Fri Jul 26 01:07:13 GMT 2024
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=e26ff6c44e7546b9f761e00bb7cf76a3fa8bfc5d
commit e26ff6c44e7546b9f761e00bb7cf76a3fa8bfc5d
Author: Alan Modra <amodra@gmail.com>
Date: Fri Jul 26 08:49:48 2024 +0930
ARM print_insn_mve assertion
This corrects objdump -d -m armv8.1-m.main output for a testcase found
by oss-fuzz, .inst 0xee2fee79, which hits an assertion.
Obviously the switch case constants should be binary, not hex.
Correcting that is enough to cure this assertion, but I don't see any
point in singling out the invalid case 0b10. In fact, it is just plain
wrong to print "undefined instruction: size equals zero undefined
instruction: size equals two".
I also don't see the need for defensive programming here as is done
elsewhere in checking that "value" is in range before indexing
mve_vec_sizename. There is exactly one MVE_VSHLL_T2 entry in
mve_opcodes. It is easy to verify that "value" is only two bits.
Diff:
---
opcodes/arm-dis.c | 19 ++-----------------
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/opcodes/arm-dis.c b/opcodes/arm-dis.c
index 480e4c21655..d1d7ca30993 100644
--- a/opcodes/arm-dis.c
+++ b/opcodes/arm-dis.c
@@ -9887,23 +9887,8 @@ print_insn_mve (struct disassemble_info *info, long given)
if (mve_shift_insn_p (insn->mve_op))
print_mve_shift_n (info, given, insn->mve_op);
else if (insn->mve_op == MVE_VSHLL_T2)
- {
- switch (value)
- {
- case 0x00:
- func (stream, dis_style_immediate, "8");
- break;
- case 0x01:
- func (stream, dis_style_immediate, "16");
- break;
- case 0x10:
- print_mve_undefined (info, UNDEF_SIZE_0);
- break;
- default:
- assert (0);
- break;
- }
- }
+ func (stream, dis_style_immediate, "%s",
+ mve_vec_sizename[value]);
else
{
if (insn->mve_op == MVE_VSHLC && value == 0)
More information about the Binutils-cvs
mailing list