[binutils-gdb] x86: simplify and slightly correct XCHG vs NOP checking
Jan Beulich
jbeulich@sourceware.org
Fri Dec 2 08:54:26 GMT 2022
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=4473201422ad238f90f3151454959a6d35cfb6c2
commit 4473201422ad238f90f3151454959a6d35cfb6c2
Author: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@suse.com>
Date: Fri Dec 2 09:53:33 2022 +0100
x86: simplify and slightly correct XCHG vs NOP checking
For one, because of CheckRegSize, there's no need to check the size of
both (register) operands. And then in process_suffix() check opcode
space rather than the (potentially ambiguous) extension opcode.
Diff:
---
gas/config/tc-i386.c | 8 +++-----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gas/config/tc-i386.c b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
index c58a570123f..3c1e2c91afc 100644
--- a/gas/config/tc-i386.c
+++ b/gas/config/tc-i386.c
@@ -6686,8 +6686,7 @@ match_template (char mnem_suffix)
&& t->opcode_modifier.opcodespace == SPACE_BASE
&& i.types[0].bitfield.instance == Accum
&& i.types[0].bitfield.dword
- && i.types[1].bitfield.instance == Accum
- && i.types[1].bitfield.dword)
+ && i.types[1].bitfield.instance == Accum)
continue;
/* xrelease mov %eax, <disp> is another special case. It must not
match the accumulator-only encoding of mov. */
@@ -7408,11 +7407,10 @@ process_suffix (void)
need rex64. */
&& ! (i.operands == 2
&& i.tm.base_opcode == 0x90
- && i.tm.extension_opcode == None
+ && i.tm.opcode_modifier.opcodespace == SPACE_BASE
&& i.types[0].bitfield.instance == Accum
&& i.types[0].bitfield.qword
- && i.types[1].bitfield.instance == Accum
- && i.types[1].bitfield.qword))
+ && i.types[1].bitfield.instance == Accum))
i.rex |= REX_W;
break;
More information about the Binutils-cvs
mailing list