GNU linker on mips
Ian Lance Taylor
ian@cygnus.com
Thu Feb 4 19:17:00 GMT 1999
Date: Wed, 3 Feb 1999 13:03:47 +0100
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
On Tue, Feb 02, 1999 at 09:37:17PM -0500, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> I don't know of any system which uses a zero value for __start. Most
> systems protect the zero page to catch null pointer dereferences. Why
> do you expect __start to be zero? What sorts of problems are you
> seeing?
Sorry, braino on my side. I meant SHLIB_TEXT_START_ADDR, not __start. MIPS
systems typically use 0x5ffe0000, not zero and that triggered kernel bugs,
glibc bugs and some undesireable behaviour in the Linux kernel, glibc dynamic
linker and others I forgot. It did not trigger any bfd / gas / binutils bugs.
Ah. I don't know why SHLIB_TEXT_START_ADDR should be anything other
than zero. It seems to me that making it zero is a bit more natural
for the RELATIVE relocs, but I don't think MIPS ELF has a RELATIVE
reloc anyhow, and of course it shouldn't really matter anyhow.
If it is more convenient for the Linux kernel to make
SHLIB_TEXT_START_ADDR 0 for MIPS GNU/Linux, then I can't see any
reason not to do it.
Ian
More information about the Bfd
mailing list