Stop the Insanity! Linespec Rewrite
Keith Seitz
keiths@redhat.com
Fri Mar 2 22:41:00 GMT 2012
On 03/02/2012 08:59 AM, Tom Tromey wrote:
> Keith> o We now have a (trivial) parser and a lexer. The lexer "word" breaks
> Keith> the input on ':', but it does know about "::" as a scope operator for
> Keith> C++ (but nothing on ObjC).
>
> From reading the code I had a feeling that a leading ":" wasn't handled
> properly. So I tried it, and `b ::foo' causes an internal error.
Doh! I can't believe there is no existing test for that! In any case,
I've got a patch for that.
> A couple other notes -
>
> linespec_parse_line_offset only allows decimal but the lexer allows hex.
> But why bother with hex?
That's a cleanup. I implemented that a loooong time ago, well, just
because I could. I'll remove that during the cleanup phase (along with
several other unnecessary things).
> I noticed the code is missing 'const' in a number of places.
I'll fix those.
> Keith> For example, you cannot do: "break
> Keith> klass::'operator +'" anymore.
>
> What is the issue with this one?
Not much, really. I could probably implement something to do it, but I
really view this whole quoting issue as a workaround for bugs in the old
linespec.c We don't/shouldn't really need that from here on out.
Let me know if you want me to add that back in.
> I saw the WHATS_THIS_FOR. I'm not sure what it is for, but on some
> platforms a symbol can start with "$", so maybe it is handling that
> case. You can maybe construct one with gcc -fdollars-in-identifiers.
I'll play with that and see if I can trigger this.
Thank you for taking a look!
Keith
More information about the Archer
mailing list