This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format:	[Raw text]

OT: XML Node-normalization

From: "Nik Krimm" <nik dot krimm at emacdigital dot com>
To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2002 11:13:08 -0500
Subject: [xsl] OT: XML Node-normalization
Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com

Hi all:
There is an office controversy brewing about node normalization - where no elements have attributes, only dependent nodes.  Supposedly there is an industry trend toward node normalization, and some are worried that we'll be out of sync.  However, I have not found any documentation referencing this 'trend' - have you heard anything about this?  Can anyone point to any resources for this discussion, or even any thoughts either way?
Currently we are using a mix of child nodes and attributes, and this seems intuitively logical to me - but this is the best argument I can make - I just like it better. ;-) 
TIA,
Nik




 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Index Nav:	[Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav:	[Date Prev] [Date Next]	[Thread Prev] [Thread Next]