This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: tag minimisation


Hi.

The following elements don't 'inherit' the style, they are simply put
'inside' the <div/> element

So, to a web browser
<div style="font-weight:bold"/>
<div>foo</div>
is the same as
<div style="font-weight:bold">
 <div>foo</div>
</div>

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
[mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com] On Behalf Of Andrew Welch
Sent: Tuesday, September 10, 2002 4:27 PM
To: Xsl-List (E-mail)
Subject: [xsl] tag minimisation


When elements like <div></div> get minimised by the processor to <div/>
it's *really* frustrating.

I cannot stress how annoying it is to find that because you have an
element in your data that is empty, you get a minimised ouput element
where all following elements 'inherit' the style...

For example:

<div style="font-weight:bold"/>
<div>foo</div>

will give you a bold 'foo'.

I appreciate that html/css is at fault, but surely its easy to add a
minimisation='no' extension until browsers catch up...?  That or
continue the advice of 'add a space to the end of the element to prevent
it getting minimised'...

At the moment I can see no real benefit of enforcing minimisation.

cheers
andrew

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.385 / Virus Database: 217 - Release Date: 04/09/2002


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]