This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: The longest node in a node set
- From: DPawson at rnib dot org dot uk
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:28:17 +0100
- Subject: RE: [xsl] The longest node in a node set
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> I think I would better go for a hypenation approach. Not that I want
> real English words hyphenated, but the idea is as follows:
>
> I have long things like:
>
> 0123456-987654-784112-AS-666
>
> This could probably be split as:
>
> 0123456-987654-784112-
> AS-666
>
> Is there a way to tell the FO renderer that it can cut a word at a
> specific place? Some sort of zero length space that must be
> interpreted
> by the FO renderer as exactly that, a space (in the sense of something
> that is between words), but 0 length (i.e. Do not draw it if
> the word is
> not splitted).
fo supports this,
7.16.7 "treat-as-word-space"
<fo:character character=" " treat-as-word-space="true"/>
Its an 'invisible' space (I think 2001 is very thin space)
If you scattered those alongside the hyphens it would help.
Check your formatter supports this though. xep doesn't as yet,
nor does Antenna house. Unsure about PassiveTex.
So its there, but not usable as yet.
> Or does anyone see a better approach?
I think your approach of word splitting at the xslt stage is appropriate,
though what to split on might be difficult.
Question. If tables are proving so difficult, is it essential to have
tables?
Or how about taking the hard to format cells and providing a link to notes
after
the table?
HTH DaveP
-
NOTICE: The information contained in this email and any attachments is
confidential and may be legally privileged. If you are not the
intended recipient you are hereby notified that you must not use,
disclose, distribute, copy, print or rely on this email's content. If
you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender
immediately and then delete the email and any attachments from your
system.
RNIB has made strenuous efforts to ensure that emails and any
attachments generated by its staff are free from viruses. However, it
cannot accept any responsibility for any viruses which are
transmitted. We therefore recommend you scan all attachments.
Please note that the statements and views expressed in this email
and any attachments are those of the author and do not necessarily
represent those of RNIB.
RNIB Registered Charity Number: 226227
Website: http://www.rnib.org.uk
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list