This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: in XSL other than d-o-e ?
- From: "Julian Reschke" <julian dot reschke at gmx dot de>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:10:44 +0200
- Subject: RE: [xsl] in XSL other than d-o-e ?
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Jochen
> Metzger
> Sent: Friday, July 19, 2002 10:55 AM
> To: XSL-List@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: [xsl] in XSL other than d-o-e ?
>
>
> Hi folks,
> I'm new to xsl and read the thread:
>
> "Non-well-formed HTML in XSL"
>
> So know I'm wondering if there's an other way using
> in an XSL-Stylesheet without using d-o-e
Just declare it in the doctype withing the XSLT. Otherwise, just use
" " (which is the same Unicode character).
> This is the way I do it right now:
> <xsl:text disable-output-escaping="yes">&nbsp;</xsl:text>
>
> Is there another, much easier way?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list