This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

Re: An issue with XPath 2.0 sequences (Was Re: RE: Muenchian method, and keys 'n stuff)



> Nevertheless, I'm reasonably comfortable with it.

I think the place where it breaks down most spectacularly is when it is
combined with the apparent desire to model SQL NUL values as () using a
list, even an empty one, as a value does not really combine with the non
nested list model, which means that these "NUL" values vanish at
interesting times and lead to strange anomalies in  accumulation
functions like sum() and the loss of the useful lisp-like
non-empty-node-set = true  coercion that was in Xpath 1 but only works
in Xpath 2 "most of the time".

David

_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]