This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: Re: . in for)
- From: David Carlisle <davidc at nag dot co dot uk>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2002 18:07:00 GMT
- Subject: Re: XPath's role (Was: Re: [xsl] Re: . in for)
- References: <001d01c19799$a0878130$465169d5@pcukmka>
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Mike Kay
> I've been wondering whether we should allow the "$" in name="$emps" to
> remove the inconsistency.
I think I'd rather the $ was removed from the xpath binding operators,
if it can be done without too many parsing problems and without
introducing keywords. I find having the $ there rather confusing.
David
(I suppose this should be back on the official xpath comment list...)
_____________________________________________________________________
This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star Internet
delivered through the MessageLabs Virus Scanning Service. For further
information visit http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp or alternatively call
Star Internet for details on the Virus Scanning Service.
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list