This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Alternatives to apply-imports which allow params
- From: "Christopher R. Maden" <crism at maden dot org>
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Date: Wed, 05 Dec 2001 23:48:35 -0800
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Alternatives to apply-imports which allow params
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
At 16:22 5-12-2001, Sasha Haghani wrote:
>The XSLT 1.1 candidate recommendation
The who what now?
>appears to allow nested
><xsl:with-param> elements but I don't think my XSLT processor (Apache Xalan)
>supports 1.1.
No, I don't think it does. "XSLT 1.1" was a working draft that has since
been abandoned by the XSL Working Group, as its status section
indicates. It has no official status whatsoever, and should not be relied
upon in any way.
As to your actual problem, I'm afraid that you have to design each template
to understand an incoming parameter and explicitly pass it around in every
template application.
~Chris
- --
Christopher R. Maden, Principal Consultant, HMM Consulting Int'l, Inc.
DTDs/schemas - conversion - ebooks - publishing - Web - B2B - training
<URL: http://www.hmmci.com/ > <URL: http://crism.maden.org/consulting/ >
PGP Fingerprint: BBA6 4085 DED0 E176 D6D4 5DFC AC52 F825 AFEC 58DA
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP Personal Privacy 6.5.8
iQA/AwUBPA8i0qxS+CWv7FjaEQL8BQCfZgD5jT78DMRoJF/+DhgtwuGumIYAoMyq
+avxg+DmCzhIOrZcC9HJXriG
=n33j
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list