This is the mail archive of the xsl-list@mulberrytech.com mailing list .


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]
Other format: [Raw text]

RE: document.write


I understand, and there's been a lot of bickering about xsl:script.  But
when I read the XSLT 2.0 requirements (at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20req
)and see

"Any stylesheet whose behavior is fully defined in XSLT 1.1 and which
generates no errors will produce the same result tree under XSLT 2.0"

--then I assume xsl:script will be in 2.0--as will everything else in 1.1
WD.  I guess I'm not clear on what "defined in XSLT 1.1 and which generates
no errors" means, since whether it generates errors depends on your
implementation--and as you've said, xsl:script is not widely supported.
(Yet, it's in 1.1 WD.)

At any rate, my apologies for the confusion.

-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@mitretek.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:45 PM
To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: [xsl] document.write


[Jeremiah Brown]

> > there is no xsl:script element in XSLT.
>
> David: yes there is--it's defined in XSLT 1.1, section 14.4.  Or, see pg
293
> of Kay's XSLT, 2nd edition.

XSLT 1.1 is a draft of a version that will not happen, not a recommendation.
So it's fair to say it's not in "XSLT".  <xsl:script> is not widely
supported.

Tom P


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Index Nav: [Date Index] [Subject Index] [Author Index] [Thread Index]
Message Nav: [Date Prev] [Date Next] [Thread Prev] [Thread Next]