This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: document.write
- From: Jeremiah Brown <jbrown at techrx dot com>
- To: "'xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Thu, 29 Nov 2001 14:04:01 -0500
- Subject: RE: [xsl] document.write
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
I understand, and there's been a lot of bickering about xsl:script. But
when I read the XSLT 2.0 requirements (at http://www.w3.org/TR/xslt20req
)and see
"Any stylesheet whose behavior is fully defined in XSLT 1.1 and which
generates no errors will produce the same result tree under XSLT 2.0"
--then I assume xsl:script will be in 2.0--as will everything else in 1.1
WD. I guess I'm not clear on what "defined in XSLT 1.1 and which generates
no errors" means, since whether it generates errors depends on your
implementation--and as you've said, xsl:script is not widely supported.
(Yet, it's in 1.1 WD.)
At any rate, my apologies for the confusion.
-----Original Message-----
From: Thomas B. Passin [mailto:tpassin@mitretek.org]
Sent: Thursday, November 29, 2001 1:45 PM
To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
Subject: Re: [xsl] document.write
[Jeremiah Brown]
> > there is no xsl:script element in XSLT.
>
> David: yes there is--it's defined in XSLT 1.1, section 14.4. Or, see pg
293
> of Kay's XSLT, 2nd edition.
XSLT 1.1 is a draft of a version that will not happen, not a recommendation.
So it's fair to say it's not in "XSLT". <xsl:script> is not widely
supported.
Tom P
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list