This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: reliability of MSXML
On Fri, Nov 09, 2001 at 10:12:22AM -0000, Michael Kay wrote:
> > Okay, I apologize to Mike for the harsh wording.
>
> No apology needed. I'm fully aware that I made some design decisions which,
> with hindsight, have proved wrong and have caused the community some
> portability problems.
Question: what's the best way to try to get rid of the problem
(or at least make it easier to handle) ?
I didn't follow XSLT development lately, is the NodeSet/ResultValueTree
difference garanteed to disapear in 2.0 ? That would be a good indication.
Maybe the XSL WG chairs would agree on getting this information out,
possibly after consulting the group.
I assume SAXON has completely unified the two notions and so this would
requires a lot of code rewrite to (re)implement the distinction, even to
simply raise a warning ...
Hum, the issue is not simple,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network http://redhat.com/products/network/
veillard@redhat.com | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list