This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: schema-1 (was something about keys, a long while ago)
- To: "'xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com'" <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] schema-1 (was something about keys, a long while ago)
- From: "Hunsberger, Peter" <Peter dot Hunsberger at stjude dot org>
- Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2001 08:49:00 -0500
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> The case of attributes would have been more touchy (maybe the attributes
> were really a bad idea in XML, after all) but I am convinced we could
> find a way to express the PSVI by adding elements and attributes in a
> specific namespace instead of creating new information items...
I almost started down this path but found I didn't understand the guts well
enough to come up with a plausible syntax and/or example. This certainly
would get me what I need. Moreover, unless I get paranoid about trying to
reflect super classes and multiple inheritance I believe that this would
suffice for just about all needs?
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list