This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Are these two the equivalent?
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Are these two the equivalent?
- From: Jörg Heinicke <joerg dot heinicke at gmx dot de>
- Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2001 16:18:05 +0200
- References: <001f01c154ab$51ac4630$010da8c0@serverhost>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Hi Nicholas,
you must divide the "@style"s in the second example not by '|' but by 'or'.
Joerg
> Hello All,
> I have two ways of what I think should achieve the same result
>
> Example 1 gives me what I want, Example 2 does not. To me they are the
> same...If they are different, could someone explain to me why the second
> does not give me what I want.
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Nicholas Waltham
>
> Example 1:
> <xsl:template
>
match="p[@style='L1'][preceding-sibling::p[last()][@style='L1']|preceding-si
> bling::p[last()][@style='L2']|preceding-sibling::p[last()][@style='L3']]">
> <xsl:apply-templates/>
> </xsl:template>
>
> Example 2:
> <xsl:template
>
match="p[@style='L1'][preceding-sibling::p[last()][@style='L1'|@style='L2'|@
> style='L3']]">
> <xsl:apply-templates/>
> </xsl:template>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list