This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: xslt 2.0, eval-function, call-template
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] xslt 2.0, eval-function, call-template
- From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay at iclway dot co dot uk>
- Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2001 16:03:43 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
You seem to have missed the fact that the XSLT 2.0 requirements document
includes an address for feedback and comments (and it isn't this list...)
Mike Kay
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Volker
> Renneberg
> Sent: 08 October 2001 14:58
> To: XSL-List@lists.mulberrytech.com
> Subject: [xsl] xslt 2.0, eval-function, call-template
>
>
> Hi!
>
> After examining the web I found an old XSLT 2.0 requirement
> document from
> April 2001. Is there any new version?
>
>
> Looking at that 2.0 requirement document an "eval"-function
> doesn't seem to
> be planned. Is this right? Especially for dynamic evaluation
> I would like to
> have an eval-function in my expressions.
>
>
> Another thing to think about is the syntax of call-template.
> To me it is
> very tedious to call templates especially when using
> parameters (suddenly
> four lines are filled with almost nothing). I would like to have an
> abbreviated syntax:
>
> <xsl:call-template name="xyz"
> params="par1 => <expression>; par2 => <expression>"/>
>
> This is much shortert and easier to read (par1 and par2 are
> bound to those
> expressions). This may be possible for normal
> apply-template-calls, too.
>
> ciao
> Volker
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list