Re: Re: [xsl] Re: Microsoft XML

[Mark Galbreath <mgalbrea at maximgroup dot com>]

I, for one, believe in "the right tool for the job," be it Microsoft, Sun, IBM, Oracle, or whatever.  I hold no preconceived biases towards any technology.  In fact, despite me being a solid Java developer (been coding Java since beta 2), I think .NET is pretty cool stuff and have been doing proof-of-concepts with VS.NET beta 1 and beta 2 (C#) for a month now.

And while McLauglin is not the only source I've read accusing Microsoft of varying from W3C standards, I think this topic has the potential to get out of hand very quickly and should probably be dropped.

Cheers!
Mark

> From: "Michael Beddow" <mbnospam@mbeddow.net>
> Date: 2001/08/15 Wed AM 10:36:01 EDT
> On Wednesday, August 15, 2001 3:10 PM

> Well, O'Reilly believes in freedom of speech and allows authors to write
> rubbish like this, provided the technical content is accurate.
> McLaughlin's book is excellent on his core topics, but like some
> denizens of this list, he seems to be a knee-jerk Microsoft hater. Hence
> this ludicrous claim.
> 
> Michael 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list