This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: XSL Namespaces - confused
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused
- From: "Chris Bayes" <Chris at Bayes dot co dot uk>
- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2001 00:30:27 +0100
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Ralof,
http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform is the NEW version of xslt and is
supported by all the processors. http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl is the OLD
version and is obsolete.
I have put a checker on my site which will tell you which version you have
installed and hopefully install the NEW version of MSXML. You can test it
for me it is at
http://benbayes/xml/index.xml?/xml/utils/instalmsxml.xml
Ciao Chris
p.s. What is your native language? There are many polyglots on this list who
might help in your native language.
XML/XSL Portal
http://www.bayes.co.uk/xml
>-----Original Message-----
>From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
>[mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of Ralof
>Sent: 31 March 2001 21:55
>To: xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
>Subject: RE: [xsl] XSL Namespaces - confused
>
>
>I see, thanx for the link BTW.
>In all examples and recommendations (well not all, but most of them)
>they suggest using the http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform ns, but
>that seems to be a bad idea since it is not supported, are those
>recomendations all dated, or is there any good reason for using that
>instead of http://www.w3.org/TR/WD-xsl ?
>
>I have tried to search, but english is not my native language, so
>I have problem putting together good queries.
>
>
>
>
>
>Ralof wrote:
>> Now, why? :)
>>
>> XSL Processor
>> Vendor: Microsoft
>> Processor version: Original IE5 (or old version of other processor)
>
>You answered your own question.
>
>Please read the MSXML XSLT FAQ at http://www.netcrucible.com/
>
> - Mike
>
>
> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
>
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list