This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
Re: Is XSLT the right name?
- To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
- Subject: Re: [xsl] Is XSLT the right name?
- From: Tony Graham - Sun Ireland - Staff Engineer <Tony dot Graham at ireland dot sun dot com>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:21:02 +0000 (GMT)
- References: <AOEKKCOOGNDOAHCLNEIFIEJICEAA.mike@wyeast.net><3AB6991B.F3D55D3F@gmx.de>
- Reply-To: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
Martin Stricker wrote at 20 Mar 2001 +0100:
> I'm ok with the name XSLT, I just would like to have a consistent way
> doing the XSL names: Either XSL-T and XSL-FO (preferred) or XSLT and
> XSLFO. Having XSLT and XSL-FO is weird. ;-))
Neither XSL-FO nor XSLFO are used in the XSL CR. "xsl-fo" appears
only as the first five characters of "xsl-following", "xsl-footnote",
and "xsl-footnote-separator". XSLFO doesn't appear at all.
"XSL-FO" (and any variation on it that you've seen) is merely a term
that has come into common use but that has no standing in the XSL CR.
>From the point of view of the XSL CR, the formatting process is not a
separable portion of XSL, so the CR never uses the term.
Regards,
Tony Graham
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tony Graham mailto:tony.graham@ireland.sun.com
Sun Microsystems Ireland Ltd Phone: +353 1 8199708
Hamilton House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3 x(70)19708
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list